top of page

Beyond Truth Gets Into Details of the No!No! PRO


A review on the web site Beyond Talk gives a solid “meh” rating of the no!no! PRO Hair Removal system.

The exhaustive article, which goes into all aspects of the device from its history to comparisons to other similar products, reports that the no!no!PRO is OK at long-lasting hair removal and requires diligent following of directions to get the most from the product.

The article says the no!no! PRO must be used consistently over the period of a month before the user sees any remarkable results.

(By results the article means that once the hair is removed it doesn’t grow back. The heat and electronic pulses involved in the procedure will supposedly inhibit the roots from regrowth.)

The article cites positive reviews are mostly from people who use the product faithfully over upwards of a year.

The Beyond Truth article says the no!no! PRO rates only 2.5 out of 5 stars when tested for its ability to limit regrowth of hair. It does, however, say the product is safe to use around the bikini line and face unlike some of its cheaper competitors.

Among competitors discussed in the article are the Philips Lumea, Silk’n Flash&Go and Veet Infini’Silk Pro, all of which use similar light-based technology to remove unwanted hair. The author recommends the Infini’Silk Pro and Flash&Go over the no!no! PRO in terms of “quality and results,” particularly when removing hair from the face.

The article points out a couple of warnings of the light-based hair removal product:

1) You will smell burning hair.

2)Protective eye gear is a good idea.

It also concludes that the NoNo Hair Removal and other in-home devices are less expensive than professional waxing treatments.

Recent Posts
Archive
bottom of page